Apple Vs. Samsung Head Juror: ‘Evidence Was Overwhelming’
The director of the Apple vs. Samsung jury explained in an talk Monday how it came to such a rapid preference – notwithstanding occurrence a stand-off between a few jurors early in the process.
Velvin Hogan, an electrical operative who headed up the jury, told BloombergTV how the jury came to find Samsung guilty in the box and endowment Apple more than $1 billion.
“I think it was eventually going to gaunt the other way, ” he said. As the jury went by any point, however, Hogan mentioned it became more and more assumingly that Samsung was guilty.
“The indication was overwhelming,” Hogan said. ” Samsung should have well known or did know they were infringing.”
Hogan, who has his own obvious regarding to video games, says nobody on the jury uses an iPhone and that he has purposely never purchased an Apple product. Hogan moreover doesn’t own any Samsung products. The usually Samsung product in his home: a unit phone used by his spouse that’s “not even a smartphone.”
Shortly after the court’s statute Friday, Samsung released a matter especially mission out the juror’s preference on Apple’s pattern patent: “It is unfavorable that obvious law may be manipulated to give one firm a corner over rectangles with spherical corners,” it read.
But Hogan says that the jury done the preference not formed just one component of the design, such as a device’s rectangle shape.
“In the box of the pattern obvious it was the look and feel of it, and how the device presented itself,” he said. “When you compared them side by side, it was strong the obvious was valid.”
When asked if he think this was a box that could be rubbed by a normal jury, Hogan answered with a firm “Yes we do.” He then went on to say “While it was complicated, we believe that any jury of the peers could have reached this decision.”
The jury in the box found that Samsung “willfully” infringed on 5 of 7 Apple patents inclusive the iPhone’s iconography, its “pinch-and-zoom” feature, the “bounce-back” outcome in on-screen scrolling and the double-tap zoom.
Apple is now attempting to inhibit the sale of 8 Samsung products in the U.S. as a result of the case.
Samsung has indicated skeleton to counter-sue Apple.
Short URL: http://zagrib.com/?p=6221